MY TAKE: THE ULTIMATE ARGUMENT

The back and forth between the Harris and the Trump campaigns is obviously not ending any time soon but the ultimate argument for choosing the former President is the fact that he is a proven commodity -- i.e., he has actually done and done so successfully what the current Vice President is merely promising what she will do if and when elected.

The irony of course is that Harris has been in a similar position that Trump was for almost four years (the full term) now but has not done anything near those promises. In other words, she could have done them but why hasn't she? Beyond the irony is the sad reality that Harris could not even face the world and explain with clarity what exactly are the policies she is going to propose much less implement. Each time she is asked she would rumble through almost unintelligible remarks that are characterized by her critics as "word salad".

Promising "joy" and "betterment" is not going to cut it. The Office of the President of the United States requires the best qualified candidate -- always.